Yes. Capability must be judged \u201creliably\u201d - i.e., safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and within a reasonable time - not on a one-off success. If any limb fails, the activity doesn\u2019t count at that level. Apply Reg 4(2A) and Reg 4(4) and the 12-month\/majority-of-days rule in Reg 7.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":116047634,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":116047635,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":116047636,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888533,"value":"My client has EDS and can shop, walk, even run. Can they still meet PIP descriptors?"},"padding":{"id":115888534,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888535,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888536,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888537,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888538,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":116047630,"value":"My client has EDS and can shop, walk, even run. Can they still meet PIP descriptors?"},"answerMeta":{"id":116047631,"value":"
Yes. Capability must be judged \u201creliably\u201d - i.e., safely, to an acceptable standard, repeatedly and within a reasonable time - not on a one-off success. If any limb fails, the activity doesn\u2019t count at that level. Apply Reg 4(2A) and Reg 4(4) and the 12-month\/majority-of-days rule in Reg 7.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":116047632,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676366,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":2,"items":[{"id":4676509,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115891996,"value":"
Surveillance should carry little or no weight for EDS sufferers. Argue reliability over appearances: a short clip cannot show safety, repeatability, acceptable standard or reasonable time, nor same-day or next-day effects. Cite Reg 4(2A)\/(4) and the Upper Tribunal in RJ, GMcL & CS emphasising the proper application of Reg 4 when considering \u201csafely\u201d. Ask for full context and longitudinal evidence.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115891997,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115891998,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115891999,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888546,"value":"How do I neutralise \u2018they did it on camera\u2019?"},"padding":{"id":115888547,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888548,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888549,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888550,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888551,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115891993,"value":"How do I neutralise \u2018they did it on camera\u2019?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115891994,"value":"
Surveillance should carry little or no weight for EDS sufferers. Argue reliability over appearances: a short clip cannot show safety, repeatability, acceptable standard or reasonable time, nor same-day or next-day effects. Cite Reg 4(2A)\/(4) and the Upper Tribunal in RJ, GMcL & CS emphasising the proper application of Reg 4 when considering \u201csafely\u201d. Ask for full context and longitudinal evidence.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115891995,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676368,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":3,"items":[{"id":4676729,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115896497,"value":"
No. The decision must reflect the descriptor that applies on more than 50% of days across the qualifying, plus prospective 12-month period (Reg 7). Use diaries\/clinician letters to evidence frequency and payback days<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115896498,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115896499,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115896500,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888559,"value":"We\u2019re told EDS sufferers have \u2018good days\u2019 - does that defeat entitlement?"},"padding":{"id":115888560,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888561,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888562,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888563,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888564,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115896494,"value":"We\u2019re told EDS sufferers have \u2018good days\u2019 - does that defeat entitlement?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115896495,"value":"
No. The decision must reflect the descriptor that applies on more than 50% of days across the qualifying, plus prospective 12-month period (Reg 7). Use diaries\/clinician letters to evidence frequency and payback days<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115896496,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676370,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":4,"items":[{"id":4676511,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892010,"value":"
Anchor to Reg 4(2A) and the DWP PIP Assessment Guide (Part 2) which directs assessors to consider pain and fatigue when judging whether an activity can be done repeatedly and within a reasonable time. Map evidence to each limb of reliability.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892011,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892012,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892013,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888572,"value":"How do I bring pain\/fatigue into the legal test?"},"padding":{"id":115888576,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888577,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888578,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888579,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888580,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892007,"value":"How do I bring pain\/fatigue into the legal test?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892008,"value":"
Anchor to Reg 4(2A) and the DWP PIP Assessment Guide (Part 2) which directs assessors to consider pain and fatigue when judging whether an activity can be done repeatedly and within a reasonable time. Map evidence to each limb of reliability.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892009,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676372,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":5,"items":[{"id":4676512,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892017,"value":"
Treat posts as weak, context-poor material. If monitoring was systematic, it likely required directed surveillance authorisation and must be necessary and proportionate with less intrusive means considered (Home Office Covert Surveillance Code). Even if lawfully obtained, weigh against Reg 4\/Reg 7.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892018,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892019,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892020,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888585,"value":"The investigator relies on social media posts. What\u2019s my legal line?"},"padding":{"id":115888586,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888587,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888588,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888589,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888590,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892014,"value":"The investigator relies on social media posts. What\u2019s my legal line?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892015,"value":"
Treat posts as weak, context-poor material. If monitoring was systematic, it likely required directed surveillance authorisation and must be necessary and proportionate with less intrusive means considered (Home Office Covert Surveillance Code). Even if lawfully obtained, weigh against Reg 4\/Reg 7.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892016,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676374,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":6,"items":[{"id":4676513,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892024,"value":"
Use the CPIA 1996 Code of Practice: investigators must pursue all reasonable lines of enquiry, whether they point towards or away from the suspect. Seek full footage (not clips), logs of online checks, authorisation forms, and any material tending to undermine the case or assist the defence.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892025,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892026,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892027,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888598,"value":"What disclosure should I push for around surveillance\/open-source intelligence?"},"padding":{"id":115888599,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888600,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888601,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888602,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888603,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892021,"value":"What disclosure should I push for around surveillance\/open-source intelligence?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892022,"value":"
Use the CPIA 1996 Code of Practice: investigators must pursue all reasonable lines of enquiry, whether they point towards or away from the suspect. Seek full footage (not clips), logs of online checks, authorisation forms, and any material tending to undermine the case or assist the defence.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892023,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676376,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":7,"items":[{"id":4676514,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892031,"value":"
Lead with longitudinal clinical evidence (specialist\/OT\/GP letters, care plans, prescriptions) and diaries\/witness statements, then context-limited sources (employer records), and treat surveillance\/social media as corroborative at best. Cross-refer everything to Reg 4 and Reg 7. Use PIPAG Part 2 for the reliability language.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892032,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892033,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892034,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888611,"value":"What evidence order should I argue for at tribunal or in negotiation?"},"padding":{"id":115888612,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888613,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888614,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888615,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888616,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892028,"value":"What evidence order should I argue for at tribunal or in negotiation?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892029,"value":"
Lead with longitudinal clinical evidence (specialist\/OT\/GP letters, care plans, prescriptions) and diaries\/witness statements, then context-limited sources (employer records), and treat surveillance\/social media as corroborative at best. Cross-refer everything to Reg 4 and Reg 7. Use PIPAG Part 2 for the reliability language.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892030,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676378,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":8,"items":[{"id":4676515,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892038,"value":"
Driving doesn\u2019t decide either PIP component. You\u2019re assessing planning\/following journeys and moving around reliably. A claimant may drive on a good day but cannot walk the relevant distances repeatedly or within reasonable time on most days. Cite Reg 4 and Reg 7.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892039,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892040,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892041,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888624,"value":"How do I handle a \u2018they drove here\u2019 argument?"},"padding":{"id":115888625,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888626,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888627,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888628,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888629,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892035,"value":"How do I handle a \u2018they drove here\u2019 argument?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892036,"value":"
Driving doesn\u2019t decide either PIP component. You\u2019re assessing planning\/following journeys and moving around reliably. A claimant may drive on a good day but cannot walk the relevant distances repeatedly or within reasonable time on most days. Cite Reg 4 and Reg 7.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892037,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676380,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":9,"items":[{"id":4676860,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115900593,"value":"
For EDS sufferers, frame it factually as a non-typical, one-off feat that doesn\u2019t meet reliability or majority-of-days. Emphasise post-exertional flare evidence (pain\/fatigue, instability) and that the legal test asks whether similar exertion - or ordinary tasks - can be performed repeatedly and within reasonable time across the year. Reg 4\/Reg 7 plus the RJ case support your line.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115900594,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115900595,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115900596,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888637,"value":"They ran a half-marathon for charity - how do I deal with that?"},"padding":{"id":115888638,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888639,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888640,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888641,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888642,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115900590,"value":"They ran a half-marathon for charity - how do I deal with that?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115900591,"value":"
For EDS sufferers, frame it factually as a non-typical, one-off feat that doesn\u2019t meet reliability or majority-of-days. Emphasise post-exertional flare evidence (pain\/fatigue, instability) and that the legal test asks whether similar exertion - or ordinary tasks - can be performed repeatedly and within reasonable time across the year. Reg 4\/Reg 7 plus the RJ case support your line.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115900592,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676382,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":10,"items":[{"id":4681988,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":116047640,"value":"
Yes. Reg 4 limbs fail if the activity can\u2019t be done safely (risk of dislocation\/fainting), to an acceptable standard (without undue pain), repeatedly, or in less than or equal twice the time. Map medical evidence to each limb; stress Reg 7 on frequency.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":116047641,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":116047642,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":116047643,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888650,"value":"They climbed a hill while walking dogs - is this permissable for an EDS sufferer receiving PIP?"},"padding":{"id":115888654,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888655,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888656,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888657,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888658,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":116047637,"value":"They climbed a hill while walking dogs - is this permissable for an EDS sufferer receiving PIP?"},"answerMeta":{"id":116047638,"value":"
Yes. Reg 4 limbs fail if the activity can\u2019t be done safely (risk of dislocation\/fainting), to an acceptable standard (without undue pain), repeatedly, or in less than or equal twice the time. Map medical evidence to each limb; stress Reg 7 on frequency.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":116047639,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676384,"type":"expandable","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":11,"items":[{"id":4676518,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":0,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115892059,"value":"
One lift does not equal repeatedly that day, or safely. In EDS, brief loads can precipitate injury and multi-day payback, failing Reg 4 even if technically possible once. Push for majority-of-days analysis.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115892060,"value":"4px"},"textColor":{"id":115892061,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115892062,"value":"#0000"}}}],"properties":{"title":{"id":115888663,"value":"They were seen lifting shopping. What do I say about that?"},"padding":{"id":115888667,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115888668,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115888669,"value":"#fff0"},"published":{"id":115888670,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115888671,"value":"[]"},"questionMeta":{"id":115892056,"value":"They were seen lifting shopping. What do I say about that?"},"answerMeta":{"id":115892057,"value":"
One lift does not equal repeatedly that day, or safely. In EDS, brief loads can precipitate injury and multi-day payback, failing Reg 4 even if technically possible once. Push for majority-of-days analysis.<\/p>"},"template":{"id":115892058,"value":"expandable"}}},{"id":4676723,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":14,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115896114,"value":"
Teemill is an ethical print-on-demand service that supplies fundraising products for the likes of Greenpeace, the RSPB, Wildlife Trusts, BBC Earth, Chris Packham and more. We have teamed up with Teemill to offer a selection of EDS-related gifts. 100% of profits<\/strong> will go into social media advertising to promote this website and educate people about living with EDS.<\/p>"},"borderRadius":{"id":115896115,"value":"#{text.border.radius}"},"textColor":{"id":115896116,"value":"#{text.color}"},"backgroundColour":{"id":115896117,"value":"#0000"},"truncateHeight":{"id":115896118,"value":null},"padding":{"id":115896120,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115896121,"value":"0"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115896122,"value":"#{text.fullBackground.color}"},"published":{"id":115896123,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115896124,"value":"[]"},"template":{"id":115946493,"value":"text"}}},{"id":4678434,"type":"banner","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":13,"items":[],"properties":{"type":{"id":115946461,"value":"slim"},"title":{"id":115946462,"value":null},"copy":{"id":115946463,"value":null},"titleColor":{"id":115946464,"value":"#{banner.title.color}"},"titleBackground":{"id":115946465,"value":"#{banner.title.background.color}"},"copyColor":{"id":115946466,"value":"#{banner.copy.color}"},"copyBackground":{"id":115946467,"value":"#{banner.copy.background.color}"},"contentWidth":{"id":115946468,"value":"95%"},"textShadow":{"id":115946469,"value":"#{banner.text.shadow}"},"borderRadius":{"id":115946470,"value":"0px"},"buttonBorderRadius":{"id":115946471,"value":"#{button.border.radius}"},"buttonBackgroundColor":{"id":115946472,"value":"#{button.primary.color}"},"buttonStyle":{"id":115946473,"value":"secondary"},"buttonSize":{"id":115946474,"value":"standard"},"overlayOpacity":{"id":115946475,"value":"0"},"overlayColourStart":{"id":115946476,"value":"#000000"},"overlayColourEnd":{"id":115946477,"value":"#000000"},"overlayDirection":{"id":115946478,"value":"90"},"image":{"id":115946479,"value":"{\"src\":\"https:\\\/\\\/images.podos.io\\\/6tpgjnwmq5pvzn5hrxym0s9ehrdeh4wlcjckqk3jmohkovom.png.png?w=auto&h=auto\",\"alt\":\"\"}"},"video":{"id":115946480,"value":null},"videoThumbnail":{"id":115946481,"value":null},"media":{"id":115946482,"value":"image"},"align":{"id":115946483,"value":"center"},"verticalAlignment":{"id":115946484,"value":"center"},"font":{"id":115946485,"value":"#{heading1.font}"},"actions":{"id":115946486,"value":"[{\"text\":null,\"href\":null},{\"text\":null,\"href\":null}]"},"padding":{"id":115946488,"value":"6"},"fullWidth":{"id":115946489,"value":"1"},"fullBackgroundColor":{"id":115946490,"value":"#{banner.fullBackground.color}"},"published":{"id":115946491,"value":"1"},"conditions":{"id":115946492,"value":"[]"},"template":{"id":116047644,"value":"banner"}}},{"id":4678435,"type":"textBlock","published":1,"size":{"x":12,"y":0},"order":12,"items":[],"properties":{"html":{"id":115946843,"value":" PIP Regulations 2013<\/strong>, Reg 4 & Reg 7. Legislation.gov.uk<\/a><\/p><\/li> PIP Assessment Guide Part 2<\/strong> (pain\/fatigue within reliability). GOV.UK<\/a><\/p><\/li> Home Office Covert Surveillance & Property Interference Code of Practice<\/strong> (necessity, proportionality, authorisation). GOV.UK<\/u><\/a><\/p><\/li> Code of Practice on Obtaining Information<\/strong> (Social Security Fraud Act 2001). GOV.UK<\/u><\/a><\/p><\/li> ICO Guide to Law Enforcement Processing (Part 3 DPA 2018)<\/strong> (strictly necessary; less-intrusive means). Information Commissioner's Office<\/a><\/p><\/li>References<\/h3>